Verus Protocol’s Ethereum bridge was reportedly exploited on Monday by a pretend cross-chain switch message that allowed a hacker to fraudulently switch out at the very least $11.58 million in cryptocurrency.
Onchain safety platform Blockaid said in an X put up on Monday that its detection system recognized an ongoing exploit on the Verus-Ethereum bridge and shared a transaction on Etherscan exhibiting a switch of 1,625 Ether (ETH), 147,659 USDC (USDC) and 103.57 tBTC v2, value over $11.5 million.
Blockchain safety firm PeckShield additionally called the switch an exploit, with onchain information exhibiting the funds have since been transformed into Ether. The pockets reveals a steadiness of 5,402 Ether, value over $11.4 million, according to Etherscan.
Cointelegraph reached out to Verus for remark. The protocol had not publicly confirmed the exploit on the time of publication.
Supply: Blockaid
Crypto hackers stole more than $168.6 million in crypto from 34 decentralized finance protocols within the first quarter of 2026. April noticed the 2 largest hacks of the yr to this point: the $280 million Drift Protocol exploit initially of the month and the $292 million Kelp exploit.
Fraudulent switch directions seemingly prompted exploit
Blockaid stated the Verus Protocol incident resembles the $190 million Nomad Bridge exploit and the $325 million Wormhole exploit from 2022.
The attacker exploited the Verus Ethereum bridge by deceiving the protocol into believing switch directions had been actual, inflicting the bridge to ship funds from its reserves to the attacker’s pockets, Blockaid stated.
“NOT an ECDSA bypass. NOT a notary key compromise. NOT a parser/hash-binding bug. IS a lacking source-amount validation in checkCCEValues – ~10 traces of Solidity to repair,” it added.
Blockchain safety supplier ExVul reached an identical conclusion and said the attacker used a “solid cross-chain import payload” that handed the “bridge’s verification move” and resulted in “three attacker-attached transfers to the drainer pockets.”
Associated: Aethir halts bridge exploit, promises compensation after $90K loss
“Cross-chain import proofs should bind each downstream switch impact to authenticated payload information earlier than execution,” the blockchain safety supplier stated, including that “Bridges ought to add strict payload-to-execution validation, protection in depth round proof verification and pause outbound flows when anomalous imports are detected.”
The incident follows THORChain confirming on Saturday that it suffered a $10 million exploit.
Journal: The legal battle over who can claim DeFi’s stolen millions
