On this episode of Motley Idiot Hidden Gems Investing, Motley Idiot contributors Jon Quast, Matt Frankel, and Rachel Warren talk about:
-
Nvidia’s new Vera CPU.
-
The potential fallout within the CPU markout.
-
Berkshire Hathaway’s newest acquisition.
-
Passive investing’s influence on the inventory market.
To catch full episodes of all The Motley Idiot’s free podcasts, take a look at our podcast center. Once you’re prepared to speculate, take a look at this top 10 list of stocks to buy.
Will AI create the world’s first trillionaire? Our crew simply launched a report on the one little-known firm, referred to as an “Indispensable Monopoly” offering the vital expertise Nvidia and Intel each want. Continue »
A full transcript is beneath.
Do you have to purchase inventory in Nvidia proper now?
Before you purchase inventory in Nvidia, take into account this:
The Motley Idiot Inventory Advisor analyst crew simply recognized what they consider are the 10 best stocks for traders to purchase now… and Nvidia wasn’t one among them. The ten shares that made the reduce are constructed for long-term development and will produce monster returns within the coming years.
Take into account when Netflix made this listing on December 17, 2004… should you invested $1,000 on the time of our suggestion, you’d have $443,191!* Or when Nvidia made this listing on April 15, 2005… should you invested $1,000 on the time of our suggestion, you’d have $1,258,838!*
That efficiency is why folks pay attention. With a observe file of beating the S&P 500 by 4x, Inventory Advisor gives a definite benefit. Do not miss the most recent prime 10 listing, accessible with Inventory Advisor, and be part of an investing group constructed for the lengthy haul.
*Inventory Advisor returns as of June 6, 2026.
This podcast was recorded on June 1, 2026.
Jon Quast: What’s Nvidia’s subsequent large development lever? You are listening to Motley Idiot Hidden Gems Investing. Welcome to Motley Idiot Hidden Gems Investing. My identify is Jon Quast, and I am joined at present by Silly contributors, Rachel Warren and Matt Frankel. Now we have a few issues to speak about on the present at present. We will discuss passive investing. We will discuss a deal within the homebuilder market.
However first, we will speak concerning the bell of the ball, and that’s Nvidia. Nvidia over the weekend in Taipei, having a convention occasion the place they announce many issues as they need to do. However one of many large bulletins popping out from Nvidia over the weekend was its new Vera CPU. Now, I do know full nicely that Nvidia will not be a hidden firm. It is the biggest publicly traded firm on the planet. However the enterprise has boomed with GPUs, or these graphic processing items. That is an announcement for a CPU, a central processing unit, and that is not an space that Nvidia dominates. Truly, that area is dominated by AMD and Intel, and we’ll get to that facet of the story right here in only a second. However first, let’s discuss this, Matt. What’s Nvidia’s pitch to its prospects right here on why it ought to doubtlessly change to its personal CPUs as a substitute of that of rivals?
Matt Frankel: At a excessive stage, this new chip combines one among Nvidia’s Blackwell GPUs, which you’ll find in PCs at present with an arm architecture-based CPU designed by an organization referred to as Mediatech which Nvidia is partnering on to make this. It is clearly designed to deal with AI workloads higher than the processors that you just see from Intel and AMD, which personal over 90% of the market at present. Nvidia claims, for instance, it may ship RTX-class gaming, which is the high-end gaming PCs that you have in all probability seen at Greatest Purchase and issues like that, in very skinny Home windows laptops. It is a part of Nvidia’s collaboration with Microsoft. I do know it is actually powerful to maintain observe of all Nvidia’s numerous collaborations happening proper now, however I made one with Microsoft to basically reinvent the PC, and that is a part of that. It is designed to be a high-end processor. That is the key phrase. This is not the $400 laptops, designed for avid players and professionals who actually need the flexibility to multitask and do complicated workloads.
Rachel Warren: I believe these are actually good factors that Matt makes. However I believe as nicely to comply with up on that Nvidia’s making this pitch with the Vera CP actually attempting to basically change what a CPO is meant to do on this more and more agentic period of AI. One of many issues right here as nicely to notice is Nvidia’s basically telling information heart purchasers that their outdated structure has grow to be an enormous bottleneck. You consider how highly effective GPUs deal with the core pondering of AI, autonomous brokers additionally have to execute code, search databases, and actually handle these multistep loops. We’re in a time the place legacy CPUs, they crumble underneath that heavy coordination workload, and it leaves these very costly GPUs ready round idly. Nvidia is pitching what is actually a specialised site visitors controller that runs these agentic environments virtually two instances sooner than conventional options. I believe that is one thing else that is actually necessary to remove from this announcement.
Jon Quast: I need to go a little bit bit extra Hidden Gems right here beneath the floor, as we discuss this. Each Matt and Rachel alluding to this. Not all CPUs are created equal. Intel and AMD, as Matt identified, 90% of the market, basically, perhaps even a little bit bit larger than that, nevertheless it’s constructed on a sure structure that many people, together with myself, do not usually take into consideration. It is not one thing that’s proper there on the floor, nevertheless it’s utilizing that X86 structure, and principally, it is fully completely different the best way that Nvidia’s approaching it, approaching it with the structure. I believe that previously, traders have at all times considered AMD and Intel as this defensible moat right here as a result of its prospects must change the structure. They cannot simply plug in Nvidia’s CPUs, and it is apples for Apple’s change. No, you are additionally altering the structure that goes behind that. However as you identified, Rachel, these extra agentic workflows. That is the massive pattern in AI, the third wave, as Jensen Huang referred to as it. These AI brokers, it is creating exponential improve in want for the CPUs. That is actually what it is attempting to deal with right here. I do not know. Guys, what do you suppose? Is that this one thing that’s truly going to trigger prospects to change from AMD, Intel to a extra ARM-based structure, Matt, what do you suppose?
Matt Frankel: Sure and no. Not less than initially, that is going to be a really high-end product. It is actually necessary to level out what we do not know but. One factor we do not know but is pricing. We do not understand how a lot that is going to value. If laptops with this chip value $2,500, they’re solely going to seize a really small a part of the market. It is also value declaring we have no real-world efficiency information from these chips but, solely what Nvidia says. There is not any third-party information or something like that like we have now for Intel’s and AMD’s. In the interim, I actually see this chip fulfilling a distinct segment, not capturing an enormous share of the PC market. I nonetheless see AMD and Intel as having a reasonably defensible moat, basically a duopoly within the CPU area for PCs. Qualcomm already has an ARM structure processor within the PC market. It is accessible in dozens of laptop computer and PC fashions. Few folks even understand that I did not understand it till I went to buy a brand new laptop computer a pair weeks in the past. Qualcomm says it has a ten% share of the $800 plus U.S. Home windows laptop computer market. That is not the lion’s share of the laptop computer market. Most individuals who purchase laptops spend lower than $800. In actuality, they’ve a low single-digit share of this market. Nvidia has its identify. It does have that going for it, nevertheless it’s going to be a really high-end product at first, and I may see a single-digit share, at the very least within the subsequent few years.
Rachel Warren: I do not suppose it is a winner-takes-all state of affairs, and I additionally suppose it is changing into more and more clear that Nvidia is absolutely carving out its personal path inside this market. That being mentioned, I believe traders out there for a very long time have considered Intel and AMD’s structure as this unbreachable moat. As a result of rewriting legacy enterprise software program to run on ARM chips was a multimillion-dollar endeavor, if no more. However Nvidia is actually bypassing this barrier. They’re focusing on what’s the more and more multibillion-dollar infrastructure constructed completely for AI factories, which I alluded to earlier, quite than combating to exchange legacy enterprise databases. Nvidia is actually carving their very own path ahead. Loads of that is being made inevitable by the best way they’re leveraging their AI ecosystem monopoly. The arm-based Vera CPU, it comes actually tightly built-in into the hyper-advanced by way of Rubin platforms by way of proprietary connection. When you’re a Cloud supplier or Titan like OpenAI, like Anthropic, you are attempting to power a standard processor into this unified system may drastically destroy computing pace. By integrating Vera flawlessly with their new Vera Rubin tremendous chips, and Vidas basically providing a very unified ecosystem, and that might create a extremely sturdy benefit for them on this area trying forward over the subsequent a number of years.
Jon Quast: Let’s simply get to the underside line right here as we shut out this matter. After Nvidia’s announcement right here for the Vera CPU, are you frightened for Intel and/or AMD? Matt, you go first.
Matt Frankel: For AMD, probably not. For 2 large causes. For No. 1, AMD CPUs are meant for the plenty, not simply hardcore players and multitaskers, artistic professionals. You may get an important AMD processor and a laptop computer for about $500, $600 proper now. Second, CPUs have gotten a lot much less of the bull case for AMD. It has great momentum within the information heart area proper now. For PCs and laptops, it is nonetheless an enormous a part of the enterprise, extra so than Nvidia, nevertheless it’s not an enormous a part of the expansion thesis anymore, particularly prefer it was. With Intel, the jury’s nonetheless out. That inventory has run up a lot, nevertheless it’s actually based mostly on future potential, not any gross sales that it is producing thus far. In the interim, Intel’s income is closely reliant on its CPU enterprise. I believe so far as income goes, Intel may very well be essentially the most impacted right here, however will the market care inventory price-wise? Most likely not, due to all of that future potential making.
Jon Quast: Rachel, how about you?
Rachel Warren: I believe, at the very least within the close to time period, that is true when it comes to how share costs will reply. I believe it is also necessary to notice Nvidia, they’re projecting $20 billion in CPU income this fiscal 12 months. They’re aiming to seize a good portion of the server CPU market. We have already got impartial benchmarks which are displaying that their customized design outperforms Intel’s flagship designed by over 55%. It edges out AMD’s prime chip by 11% in uncooked enterprise workloads. The thought right here is that by eliminating a number of the latency delays attributable to AMD and Intel’s multi-chiplet setups that Nvidia can actually problem that historic efficiency monopoly that their chips have held for many years. What that appears like in the long term, I believe, nonetheless stays to be seen, however I believe traders have additionally discovered that it is a mistake to wager in opposition to the success of Nvidia. The aggressive panorama could be very a lot shifting, and Nvidia is absolutely leveraging importantly. I believe this is without doubt one of the greatest takeaways. They’re leveraging the Vera CPU to actually push for full vertical integration. If an information heart needs the hyper-advanced Vera Rubin platform, they’ve to purchase an entire proprietary package deal. The Rubin GPUs and the Vera CPUs bundled collectively, and I believe that is going to additionally create a whole lot of development tailwinds.
Jon Quast: After the break, we will be speaking about one of many world’s largest financial institution accounts. It is truly lastly spending some cash. You are listening to Motley Idiot Hidden Gems Investing.
ADVERTISEMENT: It is not simply that firms grow to be too large to fail, and we bail them out, though that is occurring. It is not simply they grow to be too large to jail, however they grow to be too large to care. These firms, they eradicated the competitors. They and their advisors, the economists who mentioned monopolies are good and environment friendly. They’re at present simply absolved of all duty. Purchasing actually onerous would not remedy monopolies. We warned them on the time. They did it anyway. The Ishigogenic coverage setting is what created this. To listen to why the Web retains getting worse, take a look at episode 1280 of the Jordan Harbinger present.
Jon Quast: Welcome again to Motley Idiot Hidden Gems Investing. Berkshire Hathaway. I do know that is additionally not a hidden firm. That is $1 trillion conglomerate. However over the weekend, it introduced that it’s buying a homebuilder, that is Taylor Morrison, for $8.5 billion. I believe that is the entire enterprise worth of the deal. That is truly the biggest deal that Berkshire has made because it purchased OxyChemical final 12 months for 9.7 billion. Now, 8.5 billion in relation to how a lot money Berkshire has. It is virtually a rounding error, however comparatively talking, it is a enormous deal and one of many greater ones from Berkshire shortly. I believe it is actually attention-grabbing as a result of many traders on the market are promoting shares of House Builders nowadays.
Rachel Warren: It’s. It is also notable. It is the primary main acquisition engineered by Buffett’s successor, CEO Greg Abel. It is one thing of a countercyclical wager proper now on the present macro setting. However I believe what I take away from that is Berkshire is capitalizing on what continues to be a really long-term structural actuality. America is going through an enormous multi-year backlog of housing demand. Clearly, that has been suppressed by excessive rates of interest. However within the lifespan of the market, it is a short-term blip on the radar. What’s attention-grabbing taking Taylor Morrison personal on this buy they don’t seem to be simply shopping for a builder throughout 350 communities, which is notable, however they’re additionally absorbing a really profitable inside monetary providers arm. That arm offers in-house mortgages, titles, insurance coverage. It plugs rather well into their present housing large Clayton Properties. As you famous, Jon, very a lot leveraging this unmatched money hoard that they’ve on their stability sheet. They’re shopping for a top-tier builder at low cost. I believe that they’re attempting to place themselves to dominate that inevitable building upcycle when it comes.
Matt Frankel: It is a contrarian play for certain, nevertheless it’s one which I like. I’ve mentioned many instances on these exhibits. I am an enormous fan of the homebuilding area from a long-term perspective. Even with the premium Berkshires paying for Taylor Morrison, I believe it was like virtually 30% above the share worth, it is nonetheless getting it at one thing like eight instances EBITDA. To be clear, the homebuilding business is horrible proper now. I am unable to actually stress that sufficient. There are greater than 500,000 unsold houses being held by builders proper now. That’s the most that we have seen because the monetary disaster period. Gross sales are gradual, mortgage charges are excessive. Builders are having to closely incentivize consumers to maneuver homes. However the long-term bull case is compelling. There is a scarcity of about 4 million houses in the USA proper now. About one million of these could be single-family items like Taylor Morrison produces. There’s pent-up demand from consumers and sellers who’re basically really feel caught in place by excessive mortgage charges or sideline, simply priced out as a consequence of excessive mortgage charges. There are glorious profitability economics in homebuilding proper now, even in any case these incentives I discussed, as a consequence of all that dwelling worth appreciation we have seen since 2019, 2020. I actually like this spot long-term.
Jon Quast: I believe that Berkshire Hathaway, I believe that is truthful to say, is something however a momentum dealer. If Berkshire was going with momentum, it is perhaps shopping for a CPU inventory proper now, however undoubtedly the House Builders are down. It is searching for worth, and it is taking that contrarian wager right here. Warren Buffett, in fact, he is not accountable for the decision-making, however Warren Buffett as soon as mentioned, we’re prepared to look silly so long as we do not really feel we have now acted foolishly. I believe that is an attention-grabbing factor right here. Many traders look to Berkshire Hathaway. What’s it doing? Berkshire Hathaway may look silly for a short time right here, however do you suppose it is acted foolishly in buying a homebuilder, Rachel?
Rachel Warren: Oh, I do not suppose so. I do not suppose they’re appearing foolishly right here in any respect. I truly suppose that is actually a textbook instance of the actually core worth investing ideas that constructed Berkshire to what it is rather a lot goes again to the mindset of, in fact, the nice Warren Buffett when it got here to investing in value-oriented companies. I believe we regularly see the short-term markets. They have an inclination to panic over short-term macro circumstances, and understandably so. However I believe Berkshire’s very a lot pondering in many years. They’re capitalizing on an enormous and simple structural scarcity of American housing. Paying $72.50 a share for a really worthwhile nationwide developer. That is basically permitting Greg Abel to deploy a small fraction of Berkshire’s money phrase, which is about 400 billion, I believe, eventually rely in a enterprise that actually suits completely into their present housing ecosystem. I will notice, Buffett himself actively praised Abel’s execution on the deal. He emphasised it was completed smoother and sooner than he may have managed. I believe that is as a lot of a Buffett stamp of approval as one may hope for, and likewise appears to very a lot communicate to the general technique of CEO Greg Abel.
Matt Frankel: Only one fast factor. I would not be shocked if there have been extra homebuilders in Berkshire’s acquisition pipeline. Consider the opposite actual property enterprise that has Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices. There are a bunch of various smaller ones consolidated into that. It is solely potential with this deal that Berkshire may look silly for some time. If mortgage charges rise even additional, for instance, which given the place inflation is true now’s solely potential, the housing market may get even slower within the close to time period. I consider the final route of mortgage charges and rates of interest typically over the subsequent few years goes to be decrease. That does not imply it may be a straight line. To be clear, I am prepared to briefly look silly alongside Berkshire. House Builders are one of many largest industries represented in my very own inventory portfolio proper now.
Jon Quast: I believe I hear Matt saying, perhaps some good bargains on the market within the homebuilder class. Simply ensure you’re taking that long-term view and never get dissatisfied with short-term outcomes. After the break, we will speak concerning the rise of passive investing. You are listening to Motley Idiot Hidden Gems Investing.
Welcome again to Motley Idiot Hidden Gems Investing. One fast notice. We need to make you a part of the dialog. In case you have any questions for Matt, Rachel, myself, something having to do with this present, you may electronic mail us at podcast@idiot.com, and we would love to listen to from you. We might like to learn your questions on air. Bear in mind to maintain them Silly. That electronic mail once more is podcast@idiot.com, podcast@idiot.com.
We’re going to the Mailbag at present, and this query got here in from a listener named Alex. I needed to tighten it up a little bit bit. It was lengthy, and there have been a number of questions embedded, however this is my greatest try at summarizing this query for the podcast right here. There’s been an enormous shift from energetic investing to passive index funds during the last 25 years. How has that modified how the inventory market behaves? The query right here is, does the automated shopping for of index funds assist prop up the market and make the bull runs longer in the course of the good instances? In a crash, does it make the ground stronger as a result of folks go away the cash alone or does it make issues worse? What does passive investing do to market dynamics? That is actually the center of the query right here. Simply to verify we’re all clear, you may put money into firms instantly. That is extra of the energetic investing, or you may simply purchase an index fund or an ETF, which personal the shares. That is extra of the passive angle. Rachel, we will you first right here.
Rachel Warren: There’s a couple of methods to consider this. Market cap indexes allocate capital based mostly strictly on an organization’s dimension. Automated retirement contributions find yourself flowing disproportionately into actually a handful of these giant mega-cap shares. Within the brief time period, that may create a self-reinforcing loop that may prop up a number of the index valuations and lengthen bull markets, even when the broader financial system begins to melt. However the flip facet of that’s throughout a downturn, that may be a system that may introduce some fragility. Now, if traders begin pulling cash out, index managers are compelled to unload underlying shares to boost that money. Now, as a result of the pool of energetic inventory pickers has shrunk fairly a bit over the previous couple of many years, there aren’t essentially at all times sufficient particular person consumers to soak up that promoting stress. The structural shift you could see in these durations, it may well flip these customary corrections into perhaps sharper sell-offs, significantly if sure firms that a whole lot of market traders comply with. However the silver lining right here, the automated promoting actually drives down costs no matter an organization’s precise monetary well being. As long-term traders, we all know it is necessary to actually concentrate on the underlying well being of the enterprise that usually drives outperforming outcomes over the long term. I believe should you’re a affected person investor, you are targeted on the basics, these distortions can create glorious entry factors into actually high-quality cash-flowing companies, however completely, there’s an influence, and it is actually necessary to know how that may trickle down into the shares that you just personal.
Matt Frankel: I agree with most of what Rachel mentioned. I’ll push again on one factor, and that is that the pool of energetic inventory pickers has shrunk during the last 25 years. Sure, when it comes to the variety of folks buying and selling actively, that is completely true. However on the similar time, it is grow to be exponentially simpler to commerce. You are seeing larger volumes on a per-person foundation. Pondering, what did you pay fee for a inventory in 2000 in comparison with at present? I believe $14.99 is what I used to pay. Automated funding platforms have made it a lot simpler to simply set your commerce. Folks may very well be buying and selling whereas they’re at work with out even their programs. Algorithmic buying and selling platforms, the buying and selling frequency has grow to be much more. However that is all to say. The entire motive I am pushing again is to not choose on Rachel. It is to say that there is proof to each side of that query.
Does computerized shopping for prop up the market? How does it have an effect on the market, issues like that? For instance, there was Harvard analysis completed that claims the common inventory reacts much less to earnings than it did 20 years in the past, and that is due to all the index funds and passive investing that does not instantly react to earnings experiences. There’s proof that shares in the identical index, say, the S&P 500, have a tendency to maneuver extra in sync than they did years in the past, as a result of index funds are shopping for and promoting them like a basket as Rachel appropriately identified. It is also clear that getting added to or dropped from an index can transfer a inventory far more than it did 20 years in the past. However however, a number of the most revered index fund leaders like Jack Bogle, who, sadly, is not with us, have often argued that passive indexing largely would not have an effect on inventory costs. It is a powerful query to reply, however one issues clear. The rise of index funds is actual, and it has dramatically modified sure dynamics of the inventory market in a number of large methods.
Jon Quast: Matt, I’ll throw you a shock query right here on the finish. That is the ultimate phrase. Does it make up one thing that you just take note of with your individual investing course of? Why or why not?
Matt Frankel: Sure, however not for the explanations you may suppose. It is as a result of I invested a whole lot of firms which are on the cusp of being added to a number of the greater indexes. I am extra of a small-cap investor than most individuals are right here across the Motley Idiot. I had two shares in my portfolio added to the S&P 500 throughout the previous 12 months. I take note of it for these causes. The S&P 500 index funds, the Vanguard model, has over a trillion {dollars} of capital invested in all of it by itself. There are three firms which have owned 20% of the S&P as a result of by means of their passive index funds. When an organization jumps from a smaller index just like the Russell 2000 or the S&P Mid Cap 400 to the S&P 500, it actually can have a big effect on their share costs. Not that it is a large a part of my funding thesis, however for sure firms in my portfolio being added or faraway from an index is certainly one thing I watch.
Jon Quast: We’ll undoubtedly take a bounce on that information if we will. That is on a regular basis that we have now for at present.
As at all times, folks on this system could have curiosity within the shares they discuss, and The Motley Idiot could have formal suggestions for or in opposition to, so do not buy or promote shares based mostly solely on what you hear. All private finance content material follows Motley Idiot editorial requirements and isn’t authorized by advertisers. Commercials are sponsored content material and offered for informational functions solely. To see our full promoting disclosure, please take a look at our present notes. Due to our producer Dan Boyd and the remainder of The Motley Idiot crew behind the glass. For Matt, Rachel, and myself, thanks a lot for listening to our present at present, and we’ll see you subsequent time.
Jon Quast has positions in Superior Micro Units. Matt Frankel, CFP has positions in Berkshire Hathaway. Rachel Warren has no place in any of the shares talked about. The Motley Idiot has positions in and recommends Superior Micro Units, Berkshire Hathaway, Intel, Nvidia, and Qualcomm. The Motley Idiot has a disclosure policy.
Nvidia’s Next Big Growth Lever? was initially revealed by The Motley Idiot
