Cypherpunk Jameson Lopp and 5 co-authors from the Bitcoin quantum safety house have proposed freezing quantum-vulnerable cash on the Bitcoin community, together with Satoshi’s $74 billion stash, to stop them from being stolen as soon as quantum computer systems turn out to be obtainable.
The transfer is the second a part of a three-stage proposal beneath BIP-361 known as the “Submit Quantum Migration and Legacy Signature Sundown,” which was posted as a draft to GitHub on Tuesday.
It addresses a major risk to Bitcoin — the potential use of quantum computer systems to steal roughly 1.7 million BTC locked in early P2PK addresses, together with Satoshi’s stash, which aren’t quantum-proof.
Within the unsuitable fingers, these cash might considerably undermine the worth of the community.
Three phases to quantum safety
BIP-361 builds on BIP-360, released in Februarywhich proposed a delicate fork for a new output type known as pay-to-Merkle-root (P2MR). It really works equally to Bitcoin’s present Taproot (P2TR) addresses however with the quantum-vulnerable key path eliminated.
Whereas BIP-360 protects new cash going ahead, it doesn’t handle the roughly 34% of the provision that continues to be susceptible except it’s transferred to new addresses.
BIP-361 proposes that three years after activation, section A of the proposal would forestall any new BTC from being despatched to old-style addresses, with all customers on quantum-resistant handle varieties.
The second section (B) would invalidate old-style signatures and any Bitcoin nonetheless sitting in susceptible addresses turns into effectively frozen 5 years after activation.
Associated: Bitcoin can be made quantum-safe without protocol upgrade: Researcher
Section C gives a possible rescue mechanism utilizing zero-knowledge proofs, permitting individuals who missed the deadline however nonetheless have their seed phrase to get well frozen funds.
The authors described it as a “non-public incentive to improve” as a result of misplaced or frozen cash solely make everybody else’s cash value barely extra, whereas quantum-recovered cash make everybody else’s value much less.
“This isn’t an offensive assault, reasonably, it’s defensive: our thesis is that the Bitcoin ecosystem needs to defend itself and its pursuits in opposition to those that would favor to do nothing and permit a malicious actor to destroy each worth and belief.”
Bitcoin group pushes again
Nonetheless, the proposal would render some present UTXOs unspendable by their house owners in the event that they fail to improve, which some have seen as a big philosophical departure from Bitcoin’s ethos.
Bitcoin protocol developer and researcher Mark Erhardt, who shared BIP-361 on X on Tuesday, was met with group pushback and comments akin to “this quantum proposal is extremely authoritarian and confiscatory … there isn’t a good rationale for forcing the improve and rendering previous spends invalid.”
Bitcoin Journal editor Brian Trollz rejected the proposal outright, TFTC founder Marty Bent called it “laughable,” and Phil Geiger, head of enterprise improvement at Metaplanet, quipped, “We now have to steal folks’s cash to stop their cash from being stolen.”
Cointelegraph reached out to Lopp for feedback, however didn’t get a direct response.
Journal: Nobody knows if quantum-secure cryptography will even work
