Comply with ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.
ZDNET’s key takeaways
- I tracked my steps with three well being trackers.
- This included the Apple Watch, Google Pixel Watch, and Oura Ring.
- Of the three trials, the Pixel Watch was probably the most correct.
Greater than ten years have handed because the first Fitbit arrived to kickstart the step-counting craze, but our collective obsession with hitting that day by day purpose hasn’t light.
Utilizing a wearable is a sensible solution to maintain tabs in your motion and guarantee you do not keep sedentary for too lengthy. Whether or not worn in your wrist or as a hoop, these devices act as fixed nudges to remain lively, utilizing haptic alerts to immediate a stroll or digital dashboards that observe your momentum in actual time.
Additionally: The best smartwatches of 2026: Expert tested and reviewed
The better query, although, is: do these step counters really work? The businesses behind your favourite smartwatch have spent thousands and thousands of {dollars} on analysis and improvement, honing their step counters and calorie trackers to observe each footstep you are taking and log it of their working system.
My 3,000-step experiment
I examined the step-tracking performance of my high three well being trackers to see whether or not they’re as much as snuff. I used the Oura Ringthe Apple Watch Series 11and the Google Pixel Watch 4 for the job.
To do that, I went to Brooklyn’s Prospect Park and recorded a strolling and operating exercise on every system concurrently. Then, whereas exercising, I counted to 1,000. As soon as I reached 1k, I ended the trackers. I did this twice whereas strolling and as soon as whereas operating. I wore all of the trackers on the identical arm
Earlier than we get into the outcomes, I will caveat all of this by saying that my three train trials, whereas useful in understanding how these gadgets examine in a real-world setting, have been nowhere close to as in depth because the time and limitless trials these corporations have utilized in creating these merchandise. This check just isn’t almost scientific sufficient to be definitive, nevertheless it’s enjoyable to check.
The way to discover step-tracking on every system
It is easy to see the general steps taken per day on an Apple Watch, however after testing these three gadgets, I used to be shocked to learn the way tough it’s to see what number of steps I took throughout my recorded exercises on the Apple Watch, particularly. Each Oura and Google readily provide this info after you have completed logging a exercise. Merely faucet into the main points of that logged exercise to search out your steps.
Additionally: Are AI health coach subscriptions a scam? My verdict after testing Fitbit’s for a month
However Apple… not a lot. I needed to dig by way of sub-tabs of Apple’s Well being app — not even the train app — to get this info for my three logged workout routines. That is one characteristic I hope Apple pays additional consideration to in future software program updates.
The outcomes
| Stroll | Apple Watch (steps) | Error | Google Pixel (steps) | Error | Oura (steps) | Error |
| Stroll 1 | 977 | −23 | 964 | −36 | 909 | −91 |
| Stroll 2 | 1091 | 91 | 1018 | 18 | 949 | −51 |
| Stroll 3 | 1092 | 92 | 992 | −8 | 1013 | 13 |
| Imply error | 53.3 | 18 | −43.0 | |||
| Imply abs. error | 53.3 | 18 | 51.7* |
*Chart knowledge calculated with assist from Claude.
On the primary strolling trial, Oura recorded 909 steps, the Apple Watch recorded 977 steps, and the Google Pixel Watch recorded 964 steps. On the second trial (the place I ran), Oura recorded 949 steps, Google Pixel recorded 1,018 steps, and Apple Watch recorded 1,091 steps. On the ultimate strolling trial, Oura recorded 1,013 steps, Apple Watch recorded 1,092, and Google Pixel recorded 992 steps.
The well being tracker with the bottom imply absolute error out of those three trials is the Google Pixel Watch 4, which was on common 18 steps off per stroll. Apple Watch got here in second, with a median of 53.3 steps off per stroll, and Oura got here in final, with a median of 56.3 steps off per stroll.
As I stated earlier, three trials aren’t sufficient to make any deterministic evaluations. However this fast check exhibits the variation in knowledge aggregation throughout these three well-liked health-tracking gadgets.
Author’s verdict
The Google Pixel recorded probably the most correct steps among the many three gadgets throughout my trials. I’ve already sung the Pixel Watch 4‘s praises, and this fast check provides one other to the listing. The Oura Ring and Apple Watch are nonetheless aggressive gadgets, and I might nonetheless simply advocate them to iOS customers and anybody tired of buying a smartwatch.
Additionally: I found 4 tech gadgets that actually helped me sleep better (and ditch the alarm)
The Oura Ring 4 is extra referred to as a basic wellness wearable with in depth sleep-tracking and illness-detection options. It is not your best option for exercise monitoring, however current developments by Oura have improved its step- and activity-tracking algorithms.
The Apple Watch Sequence 11 and Google Pixel Watch 4, alternatively, are geared extra towards exercise monitoring, with much less discreet designs for sleep monitoring. I a lot favor the Oura Ring 4 for sleep and the Apple Watch or Pixel Look ahead to train.
